The GeForce GT 220 v2 is clocked at 625 MHz.
It has an SPU performance of 60.
![]() | Core Speed | 625 MHz | ![]() | Transistor Size | 40nm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Architecture | Tesla GT215-450-A2 | ![]() | Texture Mapping Units | 16 | ||
![]() | SLI/Crossfire Support | no | ![]() | Texture Rate | 10 GTexel/s | ||
![]() | Integrated | no | ![]() | Render Output Units | 8 | ||
![]() | Release Date | 12 Oct 2009 | ![]() | Pixel Rate | 5 GPixel/s | ||
![]() | Required Power | 58W | ![]() | DirectX | 10.0 | ||
![]() | Memory | 1024MB | ![]() | Shader Model | 4.0 | ||
![]() | Memory Speed | 790MHz | ![]() | Open GL Version | 3.1 | ||
![]() | Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | Max Resolution | 2560x1600 | ||
![]() | Memory Type | GDDR3 | ![]() | HDMI Connections | 1 | ||
![]() | SPUs | 48 | ![]() | DVI Connections | 1 | ||
![]() | SPU Performance | 60 | ![]() | VGA Connections | 1 |
At this performance level you would be better off getting a CPU with an integrated GPU, because a dedicated graphics card like the Nvidia GeForce GT 220 v2 would not be worth the extra investment, and an integrated solution would be much cheaper, produce less heat, and require less power. We would recommend an Intel Iris GPU on one of the latest Intel Haswell processors, such as the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Desktop, or one of AMD's latest APU Family graphics solutions such as the Radeon HD 8670D.
With an effective SPU count of 60, the Nvidia GeForce GT 220 v2 processes shading and special graphical effects fairly poorly. The GPU is not too power-hungry at 58 Watts, however.
![]() |
35
|
![]() |
25
|
![]() |
60
|
![]() |
50
|
![]() |
20
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
25
|
![]() |
25
|
![]() |
30
|
![]() |
50
|
![]() |
35
|
![]() |
30
|
![]() |
30
|
![]() |
30
|
![]() |
60
|
![]() |
30
|
![]() |
50
|
![]() |
60
|
![]() |
30
|
![]() |
20
|