The Radeon R5 240 v1 is clocked at 825 MHz.
It has an SPU performance of 269.
![]() | Core Speed | 825 MHz | ![]() | Transistor Size | 28nm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Architecture | GCN 1.1 Oland XT | ![]() | Texture Mapping Units | 24 | ||
![]() | SLI/Crossfire Support | no | ![]() | Texture Rate | 19.8 GTexel/s | ||
![]() | Integrated | no | ![]() | Render Output Units | 8 | ||
![]() | Release Date | 21 Apr 2013 | ![]() | Pixel Rate | 6.6 GPixel/s | ||
![]() | Required Power | 30W | ![]() | DirectX | 12.0 | ||
![]() | Memory | 1024MB | ![]() | Shader Model | 5.0 | ||
![]() | Memory Speed | 1000MHz | ![]() | Open GL Version | 4.2 | ||
![]() | Memory Bus | 64 Bit | ![]() | Max Resolution | 4096x2160 | ||
![]() | Memory Type | GDDR3 | ![]() | HDMI Connections | 1 | ||
![]() | SPUs | 384 | ![]() | DVI Connections | 1 | ||
![]() | SPU Performance | 269 | ![]() | VGA Connections | 1 |
At this performance level you would be better off getting a CPU with an integrated GPU, because a dedicated graphics card like the AMD Radeon R5 240 v1 would not be worth the extra investment, and an integrated solution would be much cheaper, produce less heat, and require less power. We would recommend an Intel Iris GPU on one of the latest Intel Haswell processors, such as the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Desktop, or one of AMD's latest APU Family graphics solutions such as the Radeon HD 8670D.
With an effective SPU count of 269, the AMD Radeon R5 240 v1 processes shading and special graphical effects a mediocre rate. The GPU is not too power-hungry at 30 Watts, however.
Merchant | Price |
---|---|
- | - |
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
60
|
![]() |
45
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
50
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
60
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
30
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
30
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
100
|
![]() |
25
|